Posts

December 17, 2020

All posts >> Technology

Visual inspection: The Reality Vs Ideal


Visual inspection is about finding defective products and removing them from the production process. We can perform visual inspection manually or automatically with camera systems. Many companies use automatic visual inspection for different reasons, typically to reduce costs, improve detection, increase production throughput, meet market demands or even improve brand reputation.

The ideal

The idea of inspection and sorting systems is to sort products unambiguously into groups according to classification requirements.

Ideally, inspection systems are a combination of fully adjustable hardware and software that can be configured to handle all types of products and to detect and eliminate all types of visual defects. In pharmaceutical production there are many types of defects (tablets, capsules, softgels, vials, syringes, …) and each product has its own appearance with unique visual defects.

Moreover, the requirements for the classification of visual defects are not standardized by the industry. For example, a certain color variation of the product could be a defect for one company but not for the similar company across the street.

To address the user’s requirements, inspection systems often have a lot of parameters to set, which brings high risk of suboptimal or improper operation. For that reason, such complex inspection systems should be designed in a way to hide the complexity and make the technology easy to use even for non-experts. Perfectly designed inspection systems are adjustable for different products and defect types (flexible), capable of detecting defects accurately (sensitive) and, last but not least, intelligent to correctly distinguish defects from acceptable deviations (selective).

Expecting to achieve highest sensitivity and selectivity at the same time is where ideal meets reality.

The reality

Remember how annoying it is when a machine does not work as well as you expected?

The two most common reasons for disappointment in inspection technology are unrealistic expectations of sensitivity, i.e. the ability to detect defects, and selectivity, which is a fancy word for the ability to have a low reject rate of good products.

The most common misconception is that installing a system with a high-resolution camera makes inspection super sensitive and selective. However, the sensitivity of the inspection system depends on many parameters that are not always obvious. The optical parameter is not just the resolution, but also the camera noise, light homogeneity, lens distortion and so on. Moreover, there are more than just optical parameters in visual inspection systems. Stability and repeatability of mechanical handling of the product and correct image analysis are just as important.

A faulty or imperfect design in only one of the segments of the inspection system can lead to higher measurement uncertainty and thus lower detection rates and increase reject rate of good products. In addition, rejection rate is a compromise between sensitivity and susceptibility to errors, the selectivity. And because rejection means a direct loss of business, it is questioned daily in production processes.

Only when we try to optimize the production process we recognize the true value of the chosen inspection system.

 


Similar posts

The risk of person-to-person viral transmission during the COVID-19 pandemic is especially relevant in manual, labour intensive and
Capsules are the second most frequently used drug delivery dosage form, right after the tablets. Due to their
When a label on a bottle says “100 tablets”, we assume there are 100 tablets inside, don’t we?
Share this article: